When will I get to live the life my wife thinks I live

After getting my older son to school this morning, taking the younger one to the doctor, taking the younger one to school, coming home and cleaning the kitchen, fixing part of my lunch, cleaning out some of the refrigerator, stripping and re-making the beds, starting laundry, climbing into the attic to make sure the AC unit isn’t leaking any more, looking for my older sons Tae Kwon Do uniform, fixing my breakfast, taking dirty clothes from downstairs to the upstairs, caulking the bathtub, getting clothes out of the dryer, going back into the attic to see if my son’s uniform was in the luggage stored up there, picking up my sons’ clothes from the bathroom, taking things down to the basement to put in the freezer, finally remembering to get my breakfast out of the microwave, fixing myself a drink, and clearing away the junk my wife stacked around my computer so I could sit to work or play, I wonder just when it is I’ll get to live the life she thinks I live.

I want to come home from taking the kids to school, sit at my computer, eat breakfast, play games, surf porn and masturbate, and take a nap until I have to leave for work.  Especially the gaming and porn stuff.  Because that’s what she thinks I do all day.

So I’m asking someone who does get to sit around all day doing this stuff – at what point do I actually get to live this life I’ve being punished for?

You know, I’m not even sure that’s illegal around here…

When you catch someone digging up a corpse for the purpose of, ummmm, getting it on with the dead, what do you do?  Turns out that in Wisconsin, they don’t do much at all.

Three men who dug up a young woman’s corpse to have sex with it after seeing her obituary photo cannot be charged with attempted sexual assault because Wisconsin has no law against necrophilia, an appeals court ruled Thursday.

A judge was correct to dismiss the charges against twin brothers Nicholas and Alexander Grunke and Dustin Radke, all 21, because lawmakers never intended to criminalize sex with a corpse, the District 4 Court of Appeals said in a 3-0 ruling.

Guess I’ll have to start making fun of Wisconsin almost as I make fun of Arkansas now.

[tags]Necrophilia, Overlooked laws, Get it on with the dead, Corpse hunting for fun and sexx0ring[/tags]

How exactly does one steal a 3-ton meteorite?

Odd news from Russia:

Russian news agency Interfax is reporting that thieves have stolen a three-tonne meteorite from the yard of the Tunguska Space Event foundation, whose director said it was the part of meteor that caused a massive explosion in Siberia in 1908.

. . .

“It winds up that it disappeared said [foundation director] Lavbin. “Our colleagues are establishing what got lost, where the rock is and why they only came to us about it now,” he said.

Hmmmm. I can’t even begin to hypothesize how that could be stolen?

Oh, and comments after the article suggest that this news item is bogus. I still posted it, because I like it regardless of veracity.

[tags]3-ton meteorite stolen, How to lose 3 tons[/tags]

.

BellSouth hates Firefox

I’m not sure why, exactly, after years of amazing growth, the Firefox community still faces crap like this:

bellsouth-hates-firefox.jpg

I’m trying something simple – I want to see if I can get a DSL connection for my mother’s house. She doesn’t need a cable-connection and it’s associated $40/month, so I was looking for a simple $20 connection I could get hooked up for her. Shoot – I was even going to tie the account to my credit card, if the company would let me. Instead, I find that BellSouth hates Firefox.

[tags]BellSouth hates Firefox, Internet Explorer still sucks, BellSouth, DSL[/tags]

Google reader gripe

I’ve been using Bloglines as my RSS reader for a long time now.  While searching for something totally unrelated on the big, wild, intarw3b, I found this LifeHacker article singing the praises of Google Reader.  Intrigued, I decided to take a look.  First, let me point out that the LifeHacker article, so full of praise for Google Reader, doesn’t even include a friggin’ link to Google’s reader offering.  So after studying the proselytizing for Google Reader, I can’t even go straight to the tool and check it out.  I have to spend extra effort to find and hit Google Reader myself.  Yes, it’s a triviality in the grand scheme, but if you are trying to sell folks on a new idea, you have to make it as easy as possible.

Kinda like Woot.com‘s Stupidly Big Button (sign up at Woot and buy something sometime to see – it’s a stupidly big button to complete the purchase process), you want to make getting your final point across as clearly as possible.  This Keep it Simple, Stupid philosophy is why I *TRY* to make the first link in every article I post or the last link before a blockquote the link of relevance/intent for my stories.  When I want you to check something out, I try to make it easy by putting it the first link you see in the article or the link immediately before the quote I’m pulling from the article.  I’m not successful every time (this article being a prime example of failing to simplify what link is the most relevant for the story – the LifeHacker link and the Google Reader link are to main two I will focus on here).

That said, let me now lay in to my interface gripe about Google Reader, which ultimately is what I wanted to write about.  After finding and visiting Google Reader, I see a nice, Googlishly simple front page (resized here).

google-reader_resize

Hey, it’s simple.  That’s the Google style.  Since I want to try this out right away, I hit that stupidly big button labeled “Get started by adding subscriptions.”  Now, we get this screen for adding a subscription.

google-add_feeds_resize

What’s missing here?  The stupidly big box labeled “Feed URL”  Here’s what Bloglines gives you when you say “Add Feeds”

bloglines-add_feeds

But Google, in a bafflingly non-Google manner, has chosen to not give you a simple screen like this for entering the address.  In an apparent attempt to dumb down the interface, Google has made it harder for a knowledgeable user to user the tool.  No, to get my feed in there when I already know what feed I want, I’m forced to click another button labeled, bizarrely, “Add Subscription.” But, um, isn’t that already what I’m trying to do?  Didn’t I already hit a button to add subscriptions?  Why should I have to tell the reader again that I really want to add a subscription?  This is, for lack of a better term, Microsoftian interface design.  So, if I click the not-stupidly-obvious Add subscriptions link, do I get the current page refreshed? Do I go to another screen where I can put my feed address?  No, I get a little AJAX pop-open box.

google-real_add_feeds

Now I can finally add my feed and get the news I want.  But why do I have to click add subscriptions from the add subscriptions page? Shouldn’t there be a stupidly big box the first time I say add subscriptions?  Has Google decided to forget smart interface design after years of leading the industry with easy access interfaces?

I’ve been on a big interface annoyance fling after reading a lot of Joel’s commentary on software lately.  I highly recommend the two books of his I have read, if you want to learn a little about good software and interface design.

I may end up trying out Google’s RSS reader offerings some time, but for now, I’ll stick with the stupidly easy interface that I find at Bloglines.  I’ll let all you really smart folks use Google Reader.  Maybe in the future, I’ll be smart enough to catch up.  Also in the future, look for a brief annoyance based post about Windows Live Writer, since that is the tool I now use for writing to the Blahg.  And maybe the Amazon affiliates program link builder, since it’s annoying to try to get Amazon links, in my not so humble opinion.  In fact, I enjoy criticizing the works of others enough, I may just do it for other programs and web sites I deal with.

[tags]RSS, Google Reader, Bloglines, Google, Interface criticism, Interface annoyances[/tags]