The truth about rectal disorders

You know, this advertisement from the September 1950 issue of Popular Science just doesn’t strike me as the kind of thing that gets a lot of conversations going around the office.

“So Bob, how’s that painful ass problem working out for you?”

“You know Sam, I just ordered this fantastic book which covers all the major rectal disorders. Turns out I have Fistula.”

See? That’s just not your typical watercooler fare. I’m not saying such conversations never happen, but I will say I’m fortunate enough to never participate in the conversations if they are going on.


Our 164-page illustrated book describes symptoms, causes and treatment of piles, fistula and other rectal and colonic disorders. It should be read by everyone suffering from these treacherous afflictions. Write for a FREE COPY today.

McCleary Clinic and Hospital, 971 Elms Blvd., Excelsior Springs, Mo.

But I bet that Bob does get all the ladies after him. With a hard-luck story like that, who could resist him? Just don’t ask him for too many details.

Now contact Grandma Grinny there and get your guide to all your rectal aches, pains and problems. And it’s free.
[tags]Modern Mechanix, Rectal disorders[/tags]

The honeymoon hat 50 years out, from 50 years back

More greatness from the Modern Mechanix blog.  This is an image from the September 1956 issue of Mechanix Illustrated magazine.  It’s a photo of the predicted honeymoon hat from the year 2056.

HONEYMOON HAT for Moon use in 2056 has dual antennas so newlyweds can call Earth and tell in-laws to stay home.

[tags]Modern Mechanix, Honeymoon hat from 2056, What *IS* that?[/tags]

Making sure children are scientifically illiterate

(via Tingilinde)

This just in – some scientists really dislike the way creationists handle the evolution issue.  I mean, what with the attempts to get evolution removed from science books and the push to get His noodly appendagecreationism-is-science put in science books under the guise of intelligent design, some scientists get rather bothered by the whole fight and the wrongheadedness they feel the creationists show.  Take for example, this writing by Lawrence M. Krauss about the recent school board elections and evolution vs. creationism/intelligent design debate.

Voters in Kansas ensured this month that noncreationist moderates will once again have a majority (6 to 4) on the state school board, keeping new standards inspired by intelligent design from taking effect.

This is a victory for public education and sends a message nationwide about the public’s ability to see through efforts by groups like the Discovery Institute to misrepresent science in the schools. But for those of us who are interested in improving science education, any celebration should be muted.

. . .

But perhaps more worrisome than a political movement against science is plain old ignorance. The people determining the curriculum of our children in many states remain scientifically illiterate. And Kansas is a good case in point.

The chairman of the school board, Dr. Steve Abrams, a veterinarian, is not merely a strict creationist. He has openly stated that he believes that God created the universe 6,500 years ago, although he was quoted in The New York Times this month as saying that his personal faith “doesn’t have anything to do with science.”

“I can separate them,” he continued, adding, “My personal views of Scripture have no room in the science classroom.”

A key concern should not be whether Dr. Abrams’s religious views have a place in the classroom, but rather how someone whose religious views require a denial of essentially all modern scientific knowledge can be chairman of a state school board.

I have recently been criticized by some for strenuously objecting in print to what I believe are scientifically inappropriate attempts by some scientists to discredit the religious faith of others. However, the age of the earth, and the universe, is no more a matter of religious faith than is the question of whether or not the earth is flat.

Read the whole thing to see if you pick up just a bit of the hostility I think is there.  And join the debate – which is right, creationism/intelligent design or evolution?  Or maybe it’s something else, like Pastafarianism.

[tags]Creationism vs. Evolution, Intelligent design hackery?, His noodly appendage, Some scientists dislike creationists[/tags]