Interesting piece over at Audioholics on why the next-gen high definition disc formats are already failures.Ã‚Â In a nutshell – little improvement over current gen, greed by media companies, confusion over competing formats, and more.Ã‚Â There’s more to it, and the list of reasons is worth checking out.
For years weÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ve heard about the evils of MP3 and illegal downloading. All the while the RIAA and music industry had two formats that could have prevented any illegal copying Ã¢â‚¬â€œ at least for all but the most dedicated crackers: DVD-Audio and SACD. These formats proved to be higher quality than CD, presented much enhanced copy protection schemes and were easily used as alternative formats to CD. Yet both formats failed miserably to achieve any significant market penetration. Why? Without an artificial Ã¢â‚¬Å“shoveÃ¢â‚¬Â from the record industry Ã¢â‚¬â€œ which never materialized Ã¢â‚¬â€œ technology alone is never enough to push a new format into the hands of consumers. In terms of convenience and ease of use, DVD-Audio and SACD offered nothing to consumers. In fact, they made listening to music more complex, since most hardware was unable to correctly decode and provide adequate bass management for the new formats.
Could these formats have succeeded? Absolutely. If the recording industry had presented a plan to phase out CDs and the Ã¢â‚¬Å“format warÃ¢â‚¬Â had been avoided (simply by the industry picking one format over the other) we would all be using DVD-Audio players and illegal downloadable music would be mostly confined to analogue rips or older music. Is this a stretch? Perhaps, but only because history shows us that corporate greed causes most companies to miss the long term economical gains over a short term loss of licensing revenues.
[tags]DVD format war, Hi-Def video, Next-Gen video[/tags]